6

I really want to know the fundamental frequency (hertz) of every sound I play in my DAW. All I have is an oscilloscope. I can see the waveform of a sound, I can see all the frequencies the sound is at on the spectrum analyzer, but I can't get the fundamental frequency of the sound.

Is it possible to figure that out just by looking at the frequency spectrum? It is definitely not always obvious, especially with inharmonic sounds or any sound that is really complex! Is there some way to find it no matter what?

Also, is there a vst that actually does what I'm looking for? Like, give you the fundamental frequency in hertz upon hearing the sound?

5

To answer your last question first, tuners pretty much do this. So a tuner VST may help. I have not tried it, especially on inharmonic sounds.

Here's a definition (Wikipedia):

The fundamental frequency, often referred to simply as the fundamental, is defined as the lowest frequency of a periodic waveform. [...] In terms of a superposition of sinusoids (e.g. Fourier series), the fundamental frequency is the lowest frequency sinusoidal in the sum.

So, in general, you want to take the Fourier transform of the sound, and find the lowest peak. Spectrum analysers do the transform bit (ignoring some complexity around bin sizes), so I guess you could just look for the peak. You'll have to distinguish it from the noise floor, or any other artifacts, of course.

As E.P. notes in the comments, this won't work for an arbitrary waveform. Specifically, if it's not periodic, the concept of a fundamental frequency doesn't really make sense any more. Even if it is periodic, there's the concept of the missing fundamental. The Wikipedia article mentions that this is intentionally used in music to imply lower bass frequencies that are not otherwise reproducible. In these cases, you're probably going to have to do some more analysis of the specific waveform. I'm not aware of an algorithm that can perform this automatically.

You could probably build a tuner using this technique, but I'm not sure if "real" ones are actually implemented this way. A very cursory Google revealed that there are other techniques which do not require an FFT, which are probably more attractive to your average guitar tuner.

This Stack Overflow answer may be of interest: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/435533/detecting-the-fundamental-frequency

  • 3
    It's important to note that the lowest peak may not coincide with the fundamental frequency (which might not be populated) - so, for instance, f(t) = cos(2wt) + cos(3wt) is periodic, but the fundamental ( at frequency w/6) carries no amplitude, and this can still be detected by the brain. And, similarly, for an arbitrary waveform, there is no guarantee that it will be periodic and that you can even define a fundamental. Probably neither is a problem in the OP's case, but important to keep in mind. – E.P. May 22 '17 at 0:47
  • Just dropping by to say a certain physicist (and musician) agrees with every part of this answer. I'll just emphasize that waveforms in general do not have, or need to have, a fundamental. Consider, e.g., 3 different instruments playing three different notes simultaneously. – Carl Witthoft May 22 '17 at 11:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.