4

Is there a specific (theoretical) reason for using ties or different voices for notes of different length?

For instance this:

tied

against this:

voices

I understand that if it's literally meant to be sang by two different vocals you'd definitely use the latter. But I'm wondering if you can use it when scoring for a single instrument too? To me it seems more clear/readable than the tied notes. Well, maybe not in this example, but in pretty complex harmonies or motions it does.

4
  • To me the latter one obviously means two voices and more common, while the former one emphasizes that the E note is the lasting part of an arpeggio.
    – hillin
    Sep 29, 2017 at 9:41
  • Wouldn't it be more readable to have an arpeggio-sign extend over two voices?
    – Creynders
    Sep 29, 2017 at 9:53
  • do you mean this sign?
    – hillin
    Sep 29, 2017 at 9:57
  • Yes, that's the one. Spanning to the note on the 2nd voice.
    – Creynders
    Sep 29, 2017 at 12:21

3 Answers 3

2

But I'm wondering if you can use it when scoring for a single instrument too?

Yes, you can use it for a single instrument as well! It's pretty common in polyphonic instruments, like piano, guitar etc.

I've seen both of them, and if I remember correctly, the first one is usually used in more amateur sheet music.

The only time I use the first one is when I'm composing something and I'm not sure of how long I want to hold the note for; you quite often change the duration of the notes and it's far easier to edit the first one. But when I'm writing the final 'clean' sheet music, I will always use the second version, because like you said, it's far easier to read.

5
  • 3
    "I've seen both of them, and if I remember correctly, the first one is usually used in more amateur sheet music." Exactly. The notation on top screams "I don't know what I'm doing, but I thought it sounded cool on my computer."
    – Richard
    Sep 29, 2017 at 10:59
  • 1
    LOL. That would be me 😁
    – Creynders
    Sep 29, 2017 at 12:23
  • Sometimes it's just the software that one can afford has a really clumsy system for handling multiple voices. Although Musescore isn't bad on voices and is free. Sep 29, 2017 at 13:44
  • @ToddWilcox yeah, I'm using musescore. It's ok. Do you have experience with Sibelius or Finale? And especially: is it worth investing in?
    – Creynders
    Sep 30, 2017 at 9:52
  • @Creyndete It's been a while since I owned Finale and Musescore isn't any harder to use (easier in some ways) and has as many features as the most expensive Finale so I can't see myself going back any time soon. Sep 30, 2017 at 11:46
0

While the second version is far more common, and often does actually relate to different voices, I see no reason for using the first, even if both 'voices' are played on the same instrument. In fact, even then, they can be considered to be two voices. Can't remember coming across such as the first version.

2
  • "Can't remember coming across such as the first version." I guess you manage to avoid searching the web for scores and stumbling into something engraved by someone who is clueless about how to write notation properly!
    – user19146
    Sep 29, 2017 at 16:01
  • @alephzero - true - you're probably well aware of my scepticism about 'experts on the net'.
    – Tim
    Sep 29, 2017 at 16:08
0

Tieing some notes of single-stemmed chords tends to obfuscate the visible structure. It partly depends on the instrument and its ways of attack whether you do that: for a percussive instrument, the ties may serve as a reminder to "retrigger as necessary". It also depends on whether your notes are intended as constituents of a harmonic progression or actually as voicing. When doing a piano reduction, munging orchestral voices in that manner is pretty customary. For polyphonic original piano compositions, it would be quite more unusual.

Basically, if you consider this multiply voiced music which you'd split to different singers/instruments in a consistent manner if you only had single-voiced instruments at your disposal, it tends to make more sense to actually notate stuff in a multi-voiced manner. Your example is a bit extreme in that regard: one would hardly ever write it in the first manner you show.

When the notes are more haphazardly distributed and a consistent voice distribution is not feasible (are you doing your listeners a favor, though?), the first notation frees you from having to think up voice distributions making notational sense.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.