Instruments are commonly compared to the piano. What is the reason for this? Does a piano allow a broader set of music to be played than is possible with other instruments? Are there types of music that are easier to play on the piano than other instruments and vice versa? Why is the piano often considered a good first instrument?
Note: This answer is to the original question which was "Does the piano allow a wider set of music to be played on it than the guitar?"
Both answerers (so far) have mentioned the range restrictions of the guitar compared to the piano. Both instruments can do more then play specific pitches at different volumes. There are several techniques that lend themselves to the guitar such as drumming on the body, hammer-ons (or other non plucking techniques), bending pitch and playing harmonics to name a few. A piano also has extended technique: reaching inside of the instrument to pluck the strings or running your fingers across them, drumming on the body of the piano, prepared piano, and I'm sure there are many many others. Composers of the 20th century invested a lot of time in creating new sounds with old instruments and there are many things that may be done that haven't been discovered or used yet.
If one only examines the amount of notes available to each instrument, or the dynamic capabilities (un-amplified, of course), the choice is clear. Otherwise, both instruments play in classical music, both play in jazz, and both play in rock. They each have genres that are unique or personal to them; a Beethoven piano sonata or a Chopin nocturne/prelude would not sound the same on guitar and a flamenco guitar piece would not sound the same on piano. Their capabilities are completely different and their writing even more so. I, hesitantly, say "No, it does not lend itself to a broader set of music." I say it hesitantly because I am not sure what you mean by "set" and also because I'm not sure this is a question that can really be answered, other than to say "how can two completely different things be compared?" One might as well ask "Does the sun lend itself to poetic metaphor more than the moon?"
The simple answer is, yes, the piano has a far greater musical (pitch) range than the guitar - this is perhaps the most important factor. (The acoustic and electric varieties have similar ranges, the latter sometimes a bit larger.) Indeed, the sounding, written, and designated ranges are all wider for the piano than for the guitar - see the following article for an explanation of the differences.
The Wikipedia page on musical range has a very nice diagram (horizontal bar chart of sorts) of the musical ranges of virtually all common instruments. Clearly, the single instrument with by far the greatest range is the organ, with other keyboard instruments (notably the piano) following close behind.
Specifically, modern pianos have a range from about A0 to C8 (7 1/2 octaves), while the classical guitar only has a range of E2 to E5 typically. (The electric guitar can sometimes have a slightly wider range, as shown on this page.) Even considering the bass guitar too, the lower and upper bounds of the range still fall short of the piano's.
Of course, there are other factors too differentiating what sorts of music each instrument can be used to play. One might argue that as a keyboard instrument, controlled directly by the hands, one has finer control than using a bow, but this is somewhat subjective. I would tend to believe that one has more control over volume and sustenance of notes played on the piano, though I've never properly learnt the guitar, so don't take my word as final...
Most other answers forget a very important part, and indeed the purpose of the piano. The name comes from "Pianoforte" or "Fortepiano" which means "Softlyloudly", and therein lies it's invention.
Instruments with a wide pitch range existed before, like organs and harpsichords. But these and other keyboard instruments had a very limited range in volume. Small organs could be controlled by how hard you pumped, but you couldn't play first loudly and then immediately softly, or "fortepiano". The invention of the Piano resulted in an instrument that had both a huge pitch range and a huge dynamic range.
This made it a uniquely flexible instrument suited to a wide range of music, and wasn't topped until you got velocity sensitive polyphonic synthesizers in the 1980's (although electric pianos arguably is an equal to it's acoustic counterpart). And it is therefore this combination of both range and dynamics that has made piano such a common instrument.
(It's probably seen as a good starter instrument as it's also relatively simple to play basic things with, although a Recorder is also very simple and has the benefit of being dirt cheap, so that's often what you start with in Sweden, at least).
The range of music possible with a piano is considerably more than that of a guitar. While there are some impressive guitar transcriptions of pieces for piano, there is a lot of piano music that would be impossible to play on guitar without considerable change. There are most certainly guitar pieces that would be difficult to transcribe for piano but their number would be considerably smaller.
As well as a much larger range of pitch, a piano has a higher dynamic range. It is also possible to play more notes at once on a piano than a guitar.
Of course, none of this is to suggest that either instrument is better or worse or easier or harder to play.
I agree with @SRiss fully its hard to compare when considering the differing sonic capabilities, and styles of some instruments, however taken at face value - Yes the piano does allow a broader set of music to be played than other instruments. For the following reasons:
- Its possible to play 10 finger chords on the piano
- Its possible to play full extended chords with one hand and melody with the other
- Its possible to compose for the full orchestral range with a piano
- Its possible to play duets on the piano
- You can play things on a single piano which may require two or more none-piano instruments to play fully
For the most part, other instruments do not have this kind of flexibility.
Before the advent of the gramophone, people who could not attend concerts or operas often only had access to this music through piano transcriptions. This is one of the reasons the piano gained a lot of prominence in the 19th century. With its pitch range and possibility to emulate an orchestra, as well as its "pianoforte" quality, it was the instrument of choice for introducing a broader scala of music into the home for a music-loving family. The piano has really been instrumental into disseminating opera arias and famous symphony themes to the wider public.
Once radio, gramophones, etc took over, this importance has of course a bit diminished, but the piano still has a central place in music education for instance.
To elaborate on some of the points already mentioned -
Visualization - the piano is the only color coded instrument (black keys and white keys) so the relationship of the notes is contrasted.
Harmonic and Melodic ability - you can play single lines (melodic) and harmonic (chords) on a piano, and you can even do it simultaneously. There are very few instruments you can do that in an orchestra (guitar is not usually part of an orchestra). The brass and woodwind instruments (flute, bassoon, saxophones, trumpet) are all single note (melodic only) instruments for example. While you can play two or three note chords on some strings, it becomes exceedingly difficult to also play melodic phrases simultaneously when doing that, almost impossible.
Pitch Range - except for harp I think, it has the widest range of any orchestral instrument.
Dynamic Range - it can be both very very quiet and VERY loud.
The piano is basically the slide rule of pitch for western music, you can compose for everything from string quartet to an orchestra with a piano. The entire playing field of music so to speak, is the piano keyboard all arranged right in front of you.
Most of the other answers address the instruments' ranges. While it is true that the piano has an exceptional range, that by itself is only a very small part of a piano's value. Most music, especially pop and folk music, doesn't use the piano's full range. Neither does beginner music, or most intermediate music.
Instead, the piano's biggest value is that it allows melodies, harmonies, and rhythms to be played with equal ease, and at the same time. On most instruments, even when multiple notes can be played at once, as on strings, it is extremely difficult to play a background rhythm while making the melody crystal clear.
Historically, recorded music is a very new invention. Before that the only music was live music, and a musician often played alone for a group out of necessity: a small community might only have one or two musicians skilled enough and willing enough to play for a local party. If a community wanted a dance, you needed a driving rhythm. A string musician could provide this with a stomp board, but a piano player could do it with their left hand.
Another new invention is amplification. A cheap guitar is quiet, and has no chance of being heard unamplified in a loud, crowded room. A piano, even a fairly cheap piano, is loud. Between acoustic piano and acoustic guitar, the piano at top volume easily beats the guitar. The piano also beats the fiddle, which in turn beats the guitar. This is for instruments at top volume - good musicians know how to balance their instrument's volume when playing together
Also historically, having a piano was a sign of status, and once you have an expensive piano, you really need to have someone to play it, so parents had motivation to get their kids piano lessons.
In a band, at a minimum you need one player providing the melodic line, one player providing a harmony, and one player providing rhythm. You can have multiple players in any role, or a single player fulfilling multiple roles, but music that has all of these sounds fuller, and generally better, than music without. A piano supplies all of these roles at once, even for a relatively unskilled who can only play a single note melody on the right hand while playing the accompanying basic chords on the left hand. On string instruments, it takes a lot of skill to do this well.
It is also very easy to get an attractive sound from a piano. An expert hitting a single key sounds very similar to someone who is touching a piano for the first time. This is not true on many other instruments - the famous cat screech of a beginner's violin comes to mind.
Because of these advantages, pianos have a lot of music written for them. They are used in both old and new genres, so new music keeps coming out. They have major roles in classical, pop, and folk. Guitar is known best as a rock instrument, and is equally important in folk, but it is only in modern folk that its role is central. A hundred years ago, it was relatively rare. While there is plenty of classical guitar music available, it is dwarfed by the volume available for piano. My list of genres is limited to those I am very familiar with, and therefor does not include blues, jazz, or others.
In short, the reasons for the piano's popularity are partially due to the instrument's characteristics, and partially due to its history.
There are multiple reasons why the piano is a good first instrument:
- More than one part: this is good for playing in ensembles later, it helps you to listen/play along to multiple parts
- Two clefs: the piano uses both the treble and bass clef, which are the most commonly used clefs for other instruments, so if you start with the piano, you won't have to re-learn how to read music if you play, for example, the violin, and switch to, for example, the trombone
- Simplicity: it's easy to play! all you have to do is press down keys and music comes out, unlike wind/brass instruments, which require a bit more skills to learn when your are just starting out
I'm sure there are more reasons, but those are what I can think of right now
Much of it has to do with marketing. Manufacturers began to produce low-cost pianos in the late eighteenth century (led by Zumpe in England). Musical ability was an "accomplishment" for young ladies whose families could afford an instrument; by the early nineteenth century the British middle class could afford the cost of a piano. It was one of the things that made the family genteel. In the middle of the 19th century in America Joseph P. Hale became a sort of one-man WalMart of pianos, building and selling huge numbers of cheaply-made instruments. Marketers pushed the message that something was wrong with your house if it didn't have a piano in it.
Pianos really were everywhere by the early 20th century.
All the other answers here are true, and the piano really is in many ways the most versitile instrument and very nice to listen to for extended periods of time. But it was marketing that made the difference between "almost every professional musician owns a piano" and "almost every family owns a piano".
Sadly, pianos aren't found in most homes now.
If the matter is the range piano is absolutely the best but in the world of today`s classical music there are some rare guitarist composers can compose the pieces on the guitar which there is no pianist is able to play.Of course there is no market for these guys yet. So, piano can remain as the best instrument for the moment.
One important reason is that the piano allows the player to essentially become a one-person orchestra. Since you have free use of all 10 of your fingers, you have the option of playing multiple independent voices at the same time. You'd find it much more difficult (or even impossible) to accurately play a complex fugue or sonata on something like the guitar. (This is even more pronounced on the organ, where you can also play with your feet.) Of course, if you want, you can play much simpler accompaniment + melody, or even noodle around with one hand.
It's also a very consistent instrument, with its entire gamut spaced linearly on the keyboard. This makes it easy to play scales and chords, as well as to transpose. The range is very wide, spanning most voices and instruments.
From a pedagogical standpoint, this consistency makes it much easier to figure out music theory. You can easily see, for example, that A Minor is a minor 3rd below C Major, that their scales share the same notes, that the same scale repeats at every octave, etc. — just by looking at the keys. This is harder on an instrument like the guitar, where you have multiple strings at different intervals, or on a wind instrument, where you only have a limited scale that's tuned to a specific key. Additionally, sheet music maps directly onto the piano keyboard, so you can learn to read music while learning the piano.
So in short, the piano wins out because it's a versatile, all-inclusive, and consistent instrument. You can use it to do pretty much anything, it's great to learn from, and it's approachable by beginners while having a very high skill ceiling.
the piano is the result of instrument evolution since the first string went twang. the harp ...to the harp-si-cord ... a mechanical way of playing the harp from a 'key' or note board. the harpsichord was very popular. save for one problem: it only had one volume.
then the hammer was fashioned and integrated ... merging to great areas of music the string and the percussion. since the horns and harp evolved in 'harmony' for thousands of years, it is only logical that there is an inherent compatibility between the two groups that also had a subgroup of winds on the horn side. so... there is a huge compatiablily and harmony between the piano and all the other instruments. and the piano is a superset of the voice of the language music.
then enter MIDI and MOOG.