1
  1. Please inform me of any textual evidence or transcript of Ligeti for this quote:

This piece reminds me of a lecture I heard Gyorgy Ligeti give on his woodwind quintet. He wrote a melody for the horn. Why? he asked. Because, he declared ecstatically, it is forbidden for modern music to have melodies. Xenakis wrote Jonchaies about four or five years later. I wonder if he wrote these snatches of melody with the same subversive glee. I also wonder if it is humanly impossible to play the parts as written.

  1. Some Post-/Modernist Music do shirk melodies , but not all do? Has anyone a convincing counterexample by a composer who composed atonal gratingly dissonant music? Can't 'tone rows' (and their transformations) be judged as melodies?

  2. Why did Ligeti write a melody then, if he truly believed this? As an act of defiance or rebellion?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Dom Sep 16 '18 at 15:40

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 7
    Is it possible that Ligeti was being tongue-in-cheek? Something more along the lines of "I wrote a melody for the horn because [based on the music of many of my contemporaries, they seem to believe that] it is forbidden for modern music to have melodies." – Richard Dec 13 '17 at 22:15
  • What is micro-polyphony if not a surfeit of melody? – Dean Ransevycz Dec 13 '17 at 23:39
  • @Richard You may be right, but I wouldn't know. – Greek - Area 51 Proposal Dec 14 '17 at 7:59
  • 1
    Could you please find another source for this anecdote? Currently it’s quoting a random person on Reddit who is talking more about Xenakis than Ligeti, so we can only guess what Ligeti actually said or meant. – Bradd Szonye Dec 15 '17 at 2:28
  • 1
    @Canada-Area51Proposal, the following two statements are very different: (1) "I believe that melodies should be forbidden in modern music" and (2) "modern music believes melodies should be forbidden." Ligeti is stating the second, not the first. He is simply describing a status quo that he perceived to exist. In the quote, he does not express agreement with modern music's convention to forbid melodies. Basic context suggests the exact opposite: he wrote the piece because he disagreed with the status quo he described. – jdjazz Dec 15 '17 at 3:17

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.