7

I cannot seem to find an algorithm to do this.

Say I play an E (not a chord)... it sounds a certain way. If I make it into a chord an play an E Major chord it sounds completely different. What would be the chord that sounds like the single E alone and how could I find this for any note?

Thanks

  • 4
    A chord, by definition, will sound different to a single note because there are more notes. What is it you are trying to do? – Doktor Mayhem Jun 10 '12 at 19:19
  • If such things could be determined by an algorithm, unambiguously once and for all, there wouldn't be any composers any more, right? – leftaroundabout Jun 10 '12 at 23:01
  • @leftaroundabout Well, there was serialism, so no. – NReilingh Jun 11 '12 at 2:27
  • The notes of the E triad are all there in the single note as overtones, but you need good ears to pick them out. I'm not sure why you'd expect a chord to sound the same as a note. – PeterJ Jan 9 at 14:54
  • @leftaroundabout I believe here "algorithm" refers to a mathod or process to create it, not necessarily a piece of software. – user45266 Jan 9 at 17:10
21

Could it be Power Chords you're after? If you add just a fifth and an octave, it gives you a beefier incarnation of the root note.

e ----------------------------
B ----------------------------
G --------2-----------3---2---
D 2---5---2---2---5---3---2---
A 2---5---0---2---5---1---0---
E 0---3-------0---3-----------

The third (missing here) is called the character of the chord because it determines Major v. minor and how the chord leads. Without it, the chord lacks its character, and can substitute for either a Major or a minor chord ( but not a dimished or other exotic).

Also try the inversion of this with a fourth at the bottom. It's drier but still edgy.

There are keyboard patches and effects pedals that can supply these extra tones automatically.

  • 1
    Wow, how could you guess that OP was looking for power chords? Impressive. – Gauthier Jun 11 '12 at 9:18
  • 1
    I stole the germ from Ulf's answer, I think. The power chord essentially is the very bottom of the harmonic series (skipping the true fundamental, of course). – luser droog Jun 11 '12 at 17:39
  • 2
    I'm as impressed as Gauthier. I thought about the fifth interval but didn't think of it as a chord, but hey it is! (Thanks also for the reading pointer regarding my thoughts.) – Ulf Åkerstedt Jun 11 '12 at 22:20
7

In order not to mess with the qualities of a single tone, what comes to my mind is to simply add tones that are (likely) already present in the single tone: the tones of the overtone series!

So to keep the qualities of say E3, you could add E4, B4, E5, G#5, B5 and E6, composing an E major chord with an overtone matching voicing. (I'm skipping the D6 since it is a bit too much off from the nearby overtone, and also runs the risk of altering the character too much.)

But it's hard to tell what you think a single tone versus a chord sounds like, and what you expect of a chord that should sound like the qualities of a single tone.

  • I have a feeling that this is not what you are looking for. Or is it? -- As a related note I've always been amazed how the same tone can sound different, to me, in different places in a phrase or a melody. I've come to the conclusion that this is an effect of differing harmonic context as well as of the rhythmical context such as if it appears on a down beat or on an up beat etc. Yet another issue that amazes me is how the same specific interval can sound small respectively large depending on context. – Ulf Åkerstedt Jun 10 '12 at 17:33
  • 1
    read Zuckerkandl, Sound and Symbol. It covers what you're talking about. – luser droog Jun 11 '12 at 17:41
3

Aside from power chords, if you need to find the chord for a single note, you're also going to need to take a look at the other notes.

In the most general of cases, you're going to be able to derive the scale/key of the melody; e.g. if the melody contains a F# and a C, chances are that it's going to be in the key of G Major/E minor. The so called 'circle of fifths' is a great way to visualize that - look it up.

Once you've got the key, you can pick chords from that key that match the note. For example, in the key of G, the note of E could work with Em (E-G-B), C (C-E-G), Am (A-C-E), and maybe also F#7 (F#-A#-C#-E - which has two out-of-key notes right there).

F#7 doesn't belong to the key of G (it's a substitution for F#dim), but still works - which only serves to prove that there are many exceptions to this rule, and it is no more than a general method of figuring stuff out in some cases.

2

This is strange, I doubt that you can create a chord which will sound like an E alone, that's why one would just play an E. Your question appears to be kind of redundant. The purpose of a chord is to enrich harmonies in a piece, I guess the closest would be simply playing octaves.

It depends on what instrument. On certain instruments you can make overtones and have "phantom" notes which sound nicely, but other than that, you cannot make a distinct chord sound exactly like a single note since that is counter-intuitive.

0

Other answers fail to discuss additive synthesis.

Theoretically, the best solution is to take a sine-wave-like instrument and play E, E, B, E, G♯, B, D(ish), E, F♯, and so on, matching the harmonic series exactly. Using the principles of additive synthesis, one can vary the volumes of each note so as to create a timbre for the series (get quieter as you get higher). Ta-da, you now have one note made of a chord. Go ahead, try it! It sounds like one note with a rather square-wave like timbre.

I believe the closer your volumes are to the correct intensity and the more harmonics you add in, the more like a single note the resulting waveform will sound (you will need to make sure that the notes in the harmonic series are tuned correctly)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.