Even if its just a gift that someone has beautiful voice , but still is there any slight chance that a poor singer can be good and get a good frequency which pleases and amuses the people ?
closed as too broad by Dave, MattPutnam, Todd Wilcox, Richard, Dom♦ Jan 16 '18 at 14:28
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Some initial talent is a great help! But yes, assuming you have a full set of lungs, vocal chords etc. it's worth taking some lessons. And remember - few people think THEIR voice is 'beautiful'. Work on singing the right notes at the right time. Let beauty take care of itself.
Perhaps look at it from a different standpoint. It's been said, and I believe it, that if a great player is given a less than great instrument to play, they will still make it sound good. That's got to be true, but at what point is the quality (poor) of the instrument going to spoil the playing?
Silk purses and sows' ears come to mind here. It's very dependant on just how good or bad the original singer/voice is. And it also hinges very much on the parameters one uses to designate 'poor singer'. So, the final answer is maybe 'maybe'...
The requisite physical abilities for singing are the ability to control how slowly air is exhaled, the ability to make a sustained sound with the vocal chords, the ability to match that sustained sound to a reference pitch. Manage that, and everything else can be learned.
Yes, you just have too find you sound and practice and be you. your not going to be able to do everything your favorite singers do, so learn from them and use whats necessary. No the diffenrnce between differnt registars will help as well