5

The way I was taught, spiccato is a short note made by lifting your bow and lightly bouncing it (off-string), while staccato is a short note that is produced without lifting your bow, but instead by applying pressure and releasing it (on-string). However, both techniques are marked in music by dots, so how do you know which technique to use when playing pieces? I always have to look up the performance to see what other people do and then I just copy them. Are there general rules for when you should be using spicatto and when you should be using staccato? Any advice is greatly appreciated!

  • There is also martelé ("hammered"), which is starting with applying pressure, tensioning, and releasing it, and then applying the pressure again to stop. Go by speed and desired expression. – Joe W Oct 22 '18 at 7:52
1

It's to do with context and speed. To bounce the bow the notes need to be fast enough for this, otherwise it becomes impractical. For example, if you were playing semiquavers in a slow speed, or quavers in a moderate speed, it probably wouldn't be fast enough for spiccato. If fast enough, it would generally be natural to play staccato notes off the string.

0

You certainly do not need a fast speed in order to play with spiccato. If it is very fast the spiccato stroke transforms into sautille but there is no limit as to how slow spiccato can be.

Regarding the original question on staccato versus spiccato: ..., so how do you know which technique to use when playing pieces?

There is no rule really, it can depend on the type and style of the music and on the tradition of how a certain style is played. But you can find different interpretations of the same piece of music. Thus sometimes you don't know in which case you can decide for yourself and choose what you think fits the music.

Note that spiccato is a violin technical term (including all instruments in the violin family) while staccato is a general musical term. So if a non-string player asks you to play staccato and you play spiccato he might say, yes that's exactly it.

  • By fast I meant that each individual note is quick since it quickly bounces on the string and quickly leaves the string making it very short duration. You can’t really extend it as much as with the on string staccato version – notorious Dec 2 '18 at 19:33
  • @notorious, Well if you are talking about the duration of the notes I think you better use another term but "fast notes", since the term "fast" will make one think of speed of tempo, you seem to mean short notes whether the tempo is slow or fast. – Lars Peter Schultz Dec 2 '18 at 20:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.