Why are key signatures arranged in a circle like it is today, why not a triangle... or a square? Who came up with the idea to arrange the key signatures in a circle?


You are presumably referring to the Circle of Fifths.

Nikolay Diletsky originated the idea in his Grammar of Musical Singing. He came up with several designs, which I have included below.

There is only one convincing alternative to a circle. Twelve keys are to be represented, any of which might dominate a composition and serve as a reference point. Therefore if a polygon were used, a dodecagon would be the natural choice.

Arranging the keys around a triangle or a square makes no sense. Some keys would be placed closer to the vertices than others, which might imply (wrongly) that they were more important. Similarly, keys grouped on the same side might be inferred (wrongly) to belong together more closely than to their neighbours.

Here are the relevant pages from Diletsky's book:

p. 68

enter image description here

p. 69

enter image description here

Source: Library of the Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius

  • 1
    I didn't know Diletsky; that's pretty astonishing that he made that circle so early! Great answer. – Richard Nov 12 '18 at 2:31
  • Actually the only property from the circle actually used is, that going out the one end re-enters the other. The geometric arrangement in between does not matter. – guidot Nov 12 '18 at 8:23
  • 1
    @guidot understood. The point I was (unsuccessfully?) trying to make is this: let's say we make a square, with the keys C G D on one side, A E B on the next, and so on. The arrangement suggests D belongs more with C and G than with A. We are introducing structure that doesn't exist. Probably I am just being pedantic. – replete Nov 12 '18 at 8:43
  • Somewhere in this forum is my infamous "personal" circle of fifths photo. If you find it, be kind :-) – Carl Witthoft Nov 12 '18 at 14:07
  • @CarlWitthoft - hehe, I remember that. Cheers! – Scott Wallace Nov 15 '18 at 14:25

The 'circle of 5ths' is one way of displaying the result of adding sharps (or flats) to a key signature. It demonstrates that adding a flat is equivalent to removing a sharp, and vice versa. It demonstrated that (in equal temperament tuning at any rate) if you go on adding sharps, and go through the enharmonic shift that recognises F# is the same note as Gb, you eventually get back where you started.

The 'circle of 5ths' diagram makes a pretty picture. Because of this it appears in every theory textbook, and we maybe over-estimate its importance!

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.