The Axis of Awesome has a song called "4 Chords", a medley of various songs all written, or so it's claimed, using the same four chords.

Now, from what I understand, a chord is just a bunch of tones played at the same time so they sound like one. For example, a 300 Hz note and a 500 Hz note played simultaneously will be a 100 Hz sound (because 100 is the greatest common factor of 300 and 500) with a lot of nuance in it, and that's called a chord. So the songs in the medley all have the same chords, that is, the same sounds with the same… what I called nuances.

They don't.

Never mind the lyrics: there are clearly more than four sounds in any of the songs when sung: just listen to 'em. But even watching the keyboardist's hands on the electronic keyboard (for the one segment where you get to do so for any significant length of time (warning, foul language in that clip)), you can see he hits more than four chords.

What gives? Am I hearing and seeing wrong, or is my definition of chord wrong, or is Axis of Awesome lying, or is there some explanation of how the songs in this medley are considered to have but four chords even though they have more?

  • 3
    I wrote an answer you might find helpful to another question about harmony; it explains how chords can be classified by number: music.stackexchange.com/a/2292/36 Nov 29, 2012 at 12:54
  • I just listened to the song, and it has the piano repeating the same 4 chord progression in the background almost non-stop through the whole song. I'd suggest reading up on the difference between melody, harmony, and chords. In this case, what remains constant is back-up chords. I'm not making this an answer because I think it's too specific to this song to be generally useful.
    – Karen
    Sep 8, 2015 at 20:23
  • @Karen, oh is it only the keyboard they meant? Perhaps do post that as an answer. I mean, the question is pretty much specific to this song.
    – msh210
    Sep 8, 2015 at 20:24
  • It's important to note that the the songs within the Axis of Awesome medley all feature that sequence of four chords at some point within them, but unlike the Bebop Changes (I vi IV V) which many pieces repeat without alteration throughout their entire duration, the Axis Progression is almost never used as the sole basis for a piece. Even "Don't Stop Believin'", which is what the medley opens with, uses an 8-chord sequence (I V vi IV I V iii IV) rather than simply repeating the first four chords.
    – supercat
    Mar 29, 2021 at 17:46
  • related possible dupe - music.stackexchange.com/questions/71194/…
    – Neil Meyer
    Aug 17, 2023 at 11:49

4 Answers 4


The chords are I, IV, V, and vi (not in that order) which together contain every note in the key. So any extra notes could be considered to be part of one of those chords. Regardless though the idea is not that the keyboardist plays only a specific set of notes. It's that four chords (in the broader sense Dr Mayhem mentions, which includes inversions and so on) are the basis for the songs, forming the major progression and sound. Other chords (if any) serve only to transition to one of the 4 main chords. And of course this is only true for the portion of the song being played — they never get to the part of Don't Start Believing that uses a iii chord!

None of those song snippets could be played recognizably without one of those 4 chords. But they could all be played without any other chords and be recognizable.

Summarizing some discussion from comments:

There are 7 notes in every Major/minor key. Capital-numeral (e.g., IV) denotes the Major chord starting on the numbered note, and lowercase-numeral (e.g., iii) denotes the minor chord starting on the numbered note. Every note in the key is used by at least one of the four chords above (I, IV, V, vi), meaning that any note you play in the key could be considered to be functioning as part as one of those 4 chords rather than independently or as part of a different chord.

In the key of C Major, any combination of any C's, E's, and G's could be considered a I chord. (Similarly any such combination would be a V chord in F Major, and so on.) Most commonly you'll have one of each note very close together, but it's not necessary. You might consider individual notes part of an arpeggiated chord, but it's important to note that notes can be left out without making it "not a chord". This general sense of "chord" we're using is limited to specific notes, but not specific combinations or positions of said notes.

So, one "chord" in the general sense covers an entire subset of chords in the specific sense. The class "G Major chord" covers the specific "G4 B5 D5" chord as well as many many others — "G4 B6 D7", "G4 B5", "D3 G3 B4", etc.


tl;dr - your definition of chord is wrong.

Your initial assumption

a 300 Hz note and a 500 Hz note played simultaneously will be a 100 Hz sound

is unfortunately incorrect.

When you play a 300Hz note and a 500Hz note what you will get is a 300Hz note, and a 500Hz note, and a 200Hz note (the difference between them) and an 800Hz note (the sum of the two frequencies) (Have a listen to the demos on this page for examples)

In addition to that, a chord can have any number of notes in it (typically on a piano it usually has 10 or less notes, and on a guitar you're usually expecting 6 or less)

And finally, a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord.

Update After watching the actual video, the keyboard player is only playing 4 chords, and not really playing any variations of them. He is sometimes accenting certain notes more than the others, but the 4 chord shapes he is using are consistent throughout that segment. He is hitting and releasing keys, sure, but only as parts of the same chords.

  • My point was that you can see many different sets of notes being played on the keyboard in the video, and hear many different sounds sung, in a supposedly four-chord song. I thank you for your correction to my definition of chord, but I don't see how that correction addresses my question. Your last sentence, "a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord" looks like it may be an attempt to answer my question — if you'd explain how that works, and that it's done in the medley "4 Chords".
    – msh210
    Nov 27, 2012 at 19:31
  • Hitting middle C and the E above it and the G above that simultaneously is playing one chord; then hitting middle C and the E above it and the A above that is playing another chord. Right? (Again, you haven't explained your "a chord can be played in many different ways, so if I wanted to I could play a 4 chord song using 20 different variations of that chord".) In that case, [cont'd]
    – msh210
    Nov 27, 2012 at 22:35
  • [cont'd] In that case, "hitting and releasing keys, sure, but only as parts of the same chords" makes no sense to me. The keyboardist was playing different sets of keys. Note WP's "A chord in music is any harmonic set of two or more notes that is heard as if sounding simultaneously".
    – msh210
    Nov 27, 2012 at 22:35
  • 2
    If you play a CEG chord, there are lots of C's, E's and G's on a keyboard. Playing any of them together can be thought of as the same chord (just a different inversion)
    – Doktor Mayhem
    Nov 28, 2012 at 9:06
  • 1
    I'd amend "Any number of notes" to "3 notes or more", since any number could be read as 1 note, and a single note is only part of a chord, not a full chord.
    – Karen
    Sep 8, 2015 at 20:17

Your understanding of what constitutes a chord is somewhat hazy. A chord - as stated previously - consists of minimum 3 notes. In any order, in any octave, with as many repeats of any of those note names in other octaves as is deemed suitable.

Axis of Awesome have taken 4 separate chords, in one particular sequence ( the objective of the exercise), and found many songs which use those four chords, in that same order, to put together a medley of those different songs. The four chords in question are I, V, vi, IV in that particular order - that's the joke. Of course, there are other orders those can be played in - I, vi, IV, V is another popular order, but that's not the point here.

Listen carefully, and despite what you think you see, every song or snippet of song they play has those four, in that order. The players may well use different inversions of those chords (the same three notes in different orders), or add extras of the same three notes, but the same order of chords follows through relentlessly - namely here E, B, C♯m, A - thus making their point.


Well, I don't know about all this hertz stuff, that's never interested me as a musician. A chord is a harmony that is created with a SET of usually three or four different notes (tones) that are not repeated. It does not matter which order you play them as long as they are played simulataneously.

Now sometimes a band will have a song that is based on a three or four chords - these are the underlying changes - but often the musicians take liberty with this and insert additional chords, substitute chords, and so forth, so in fact they are not playing "just four chords." The guitarist or pianist might be playing more. It just depends.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.