Traditionally telecaster guitars have the neck pick-up covered in a nickel/chrome cover, and the bridge pickup left with exposed pole pieces.

What is the origin/logic of the nickel cover?

What effect would it have if the same pick-up was used with the cover removed?

Why don't we have a nickel cover on the bridge? How would that affect the sound? (I've never even seen an aftermarket one, do they exist?)

1 Answer 1


I have read much about the Telecaster, but I still don't know what Leo Fender was thinking. I know that Seth Lover was thinking the same thing, as PAF humbuckers had covers too. It was only into the 70s when you started seeing pickups with their covers removed. Even Strat pickups are covered, albeit with plastic.

In part, the nickel cover was to make the guitar look better. The bridge pickup isn't covered, but the original design had a chromed cover for the whole bridge. Because guitarists wanted to be able to do things like palm muting, they were generally left off -- Albert Collins is the only guitarists I can think of who used one -- and were used as ashtrays enough that they're called "ashtray bridge covers".

Part of the logic could be the same as the piece of tape on the treble side of Steve Vai's EVO guitar, that a string could get caught in the bobbin and might hurt the windings, but that seems unlikely because it was only in the 80s with the Floyd Rose tremolo that an errant high E could even get there.

Some have removed the cover, and some pickup makers use covers with cut-off tops. The reported effect is brighter tone and more clarity.

  • I forgot about the old "ashtray" cover :) Commented Dec 27, 2012 at 11:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.