# Shifting between bemols (flats) and diesis (sharps)in the key signature

I am a beginner in music with little knowledge, but like once in a month spend a little time playing with a digital keyboard.

I noticed that if I have some notes of a song which got 4# in the beginning of the stave, I can play the song like there is 3♭ instead. The same happens if I have 4 bemols (flats) then I can play the song like it has 3 diesis (sharps) (yes, it will sound a bit higher, but not that different).

I was curious if other combinations exists, let's say we have a song in 2 bemols (flats), what is the equivalence of it in diesis (sharps)? I couldn't find it myself. Is there a name for this phenomenon so I can learn more?

I'm not aware of a name for this phenomenon, it's just a quick way to transpose music based on how the tonal system works out.

In short, when you're in a key, look at the key signature. Take the number of accidentals in the key and replace them with the mod-7 complement of the other accidental type and you're left with a key built a half step away from the original tonic.

So you're in E major with 4 sharps. Let's take the mod-7 complement of the other accidental type: 7-4=3, so we're left with 3 flats, which is E♭ major, one half step away from the original tonic of E.

You're now asking about 2 flats in the key signature; this is B♭ major. 7-2=5, so a key of 5 sharps will be B major.

This trick is especially fun in C, which has 0 sharps or flats. The mod-7 complement of 0 is 7, so if we have 7 sharps in the key signature, we're in C♯ major; 7 flats makes it C♭ major!

Note that this trick isn't exclusive to major; it works for minor keys as well.

Lastly, know that this works perfectly until you encounter accidentals in the music; you'll have to have a more contextual understanding of those accidentals to know how they should be interpreted in your new key.

• Thank you! Give me a little time to digest it because I am using Do-Re-Mi-Fa system not C-D-E one so I need to corellate, but I will come back later. Mar 10, 2019 at 18:29
• @Zacky You will need to swap C for Do, D for Re, etc but otherwise the answer should work. Mar 10, 2019 at 20:01
• +1. Usual thorough answer! It's just mathematical serendipty, but useful. I often used to start a song in Eb and modulate to E by 'changing the key sig.'. Same with Ab and A. They seem to be the simplest 'mod-7'.
– Tim
Mar 10, 2019 at 20:02
• @Tim In the fixed do system, can't we just regard do as a translation of C, re or D etc. If I read "mi bémol majeur" in French, I just think "E♭ major". For example: fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonie_n%C2%BA_3_(Beethoven). Mar 10, 2019 at 20:15
• @Zacky movable do is the system in which the tonic of any major key or the third scale degree of any minor key is called "do." Fixed do is the system in which the key that is three half-steps above 440 Hz (the one with a letter name of "c") is called do. Mar 11, 2019 at 3:43

This is a consequence of the key signatures. Basically, what you're doing is changing the number of accidentals in the key signature by seven (some would argue that's an oxymoron, but you all know what I mean). It turns out that by doing this, you've transposed the song into the key a half-step up. If you want the same exact key, you can add or subtract 12, but that makes for some ugly key signatures.

It's pretty intuitive; change the number of accidentals by seven, and you lower or raise every note by a half-step. That's the definition of how to transpose by a half-step!

• On a related note, changing the number of accidentals by twelve will shift staff positions by a line or space while using the same set of pitches. For example, if one were to transpose a piano piece from five sharps (B major) to seven flats (Cb major), it would use all of the same pitches, but they'd all be written differently. Changing key by five in some direction is the same as changing key by twelve in that direction and seven in the opposite direction. So going from B to C would shift a staff position (going to Cb) and then moving a half step up without changing staff position. Mar 11, 2019 at 15:47
• More to the point, you transpose by a chromatic semitone, leaving the letter part of each pitch name unchanged. (For example, from E to E flat, in the OP's example.) Mar 11, 2019 at 20:30

When you describe this kind of key relationship, I just "get it," because I know the key signatures well enough. But I really wanted to know why or how this relationship exists.

Below is a chart I drew showing the circle of fifths (and circle of fourths) but arranged as a line. I'm not sure this will help you, but it shows the key 'symmetries' with keys paired up according to the funny modulus math @Richard describes in his answer.

I like visuals and made the chart for myself last night. (I couldn't get to sleep after reading this post and had to make the chart just to clear my head!) Maybe it will be helpful or interesting to you...

The middle number row 0-11 is both the position on the circle of fifths/fourths and the number of sharps or flats in the key signature.

When you go past the two dashed line boundaries - beyond the area I labelled the _7 letter gamut - you get into the weird enharmonically complex keys. You can get the modulus math to work in this region by adding a _negative number (bottom row) which represents going backwards on the circle of fifths. Ex. `E#/F` at position 11 and `Fb/E` at position -4, 11 + -4 = 7.

When all 12 chromatic pitch classes are arranged by perfect fifths and numbered 0-11, the basic sequence for a major scale - starting on C - is `0,2,4,11,1,3,5`. All the other keys signatures are transpositions of that numeric sequence on the circle. For example, just add 2 to each position to get `D` major (remember that 11 will circle back around to 0 the 1.)

At the bottom of the chart is a sort of test that the numbering in the enharmonically complex area outside the gamut is true. As bizarre as it is to say 'Eb major is 9 sharps' is mathematically true.

Finally, the is a kind of geometric symmetry of scale for each position along the circle. Any major key in the sharp keys shares mirror symmetry with the corresponding flat key's fifth mode of the relative minor. It's easier to explain by example: at position 3 `A` major `A` to `A` ascending shares a mirror symmetry with `C` minor (`Eb's` relative minor) `G` to `G` descending. You can test that on the keyboard as see how the two scales are inversions sharing the same sequence of whole and half steps and the same sequence of white and black keys.

There isn't a specific musical term for all this, but when you write out the circle of fifths as a circle of counting line or compare the inversions of scales you have a kind of mathematical symmetry.

I was curious if other combinations exists, let's say we have a song in 2 bemols (flats), what is the equivalence of it in diesis (sharps)? I couldn't find it myself. Is there a name for this phenomenon so I can learn more?

There isn’t a name for this phenomen. But we can find one. In German I would call them “gleichnamige” Tonarten, in English this would be “same named” keys. (Now, as we know they are not exactly the same name, as the “related” key*1) has added a -bemol (flat) and is a half tone lower!)

The phenomen can be explained quite simply by the circle of fifths and by the tones of the twelve tone scale (fixed do names!)

Do, Re-bemol, Re, Mi-bemol, Mi, Fa, Fa#/Sol-bemol, Sol, La-bemol, La, Si-bemol, Si.

Of each tone of the doremi scale exist two keys: one on the -bemol site (flats) and the -diesis (sharps) site. The two keys with the same name are differing logically a minor second respectively 7 fifths and can be played by exchanging the amount of # with the amount of b of its same named (“related”) key:

So this “related” keys in question are:

Si-bemol (2bemol) and Si (5#)

analogically we get (starting with Re-bemol):

Re-bemol and Re

La-bemol and La

Mi-bemol and Mi

Si-bemol and Si

Fa and Fa#

Do and Do# (Re-bemol)

Sol and Sol# (La-bemol)