3

I'm trying to write the first measure of the Moonlight in Lilypond enter image description here

From my very basic knowledge the first measure is 4 x 3 x 1/8 = 3/2 long, but the special symbol (alla breve) seams to be a 2/2. What I'm missing?

The lower part (bass), on the other side, is fine.

If someone knows Lilypond, here is my start

\version "2.19.82"

musicA = {
  \key e \major
  \time 2/2
  \overrideTimeSignatureSettings 3/2 3/8 #'(1 1 1 1) #'()
  \relative c' { g8 fis c' e g,8 c e g,8 c e g,8 c e }
}

musicB = {
  \clef bass
  \key e \major
  \time 2/2
  c1
}

\new PianoStaff {
  <<
    \context Staff = "up" {
      \accidentalStyle default
      \musicA
    }
    \context Staff = "down" {
      \accidentalStyle default
      \musicB
    }
  >>
}

All the notes are wrong, but I think/hope to know enough to correct it myself.

2
  • 2
    triplets, dude! :-) Commented Jul 18, 2019 at 15:33
  • 1
    It appears you're new to sheet music. I would recommend learning a bunch of stuff about notation and reading sheet music before trying to generate your own in LilyPond . Commented Jul 18, 2019 at 15:34

3 Answers 3

15

The notes in the upper staff are tuplets. As an aid towards your eventual goal, here is some sample code to create what you're looking for:

\version "2.19.82"

musicA = \relative c' {
  \key cis \minor
  \time 2/2
  \omit TupletNumber
  \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f
  \tuplet 3/2 4 { gis8_\markup { \italic { sempre \dynamic pp e senza sordino } }
                  cis e gis,[ cis e] gis, cis e gis,[ cis e] } |
}

musicB = \relative c, {
  \clef bass
  \key cis \minor
  \time 2/2
  <cis cis'>1 |
}

\new PianoStaff {
  <<
    \context Staff = "up" {
      \accidentalStyle default
      \musicA
    }
    \context Staff = "down" {
      \accidentalStyle default
      \musicB
    }
  >>
}

This compiles:

enter image description here

9

The notes on the treble clef are triplets. That's all.

3
  • do you mean a triplet of 1/8 is 1/4 long instead of 3/8?
    – Aaron Lenz
    Commented Jul 17, 2019 at 22:35
  • 2
    If I'm not misinterpreting what you just wrote, yes, that's the way it is. If you need to check anything with some established version, here is the scan from a Leipzig publisher, which is identical to every version I've ever seen of this piece. Just to know: are you familiar with triplets? If not, you may want to look that up.
    – 89f3a1c
    Commented Jul 17, 2019 at 22:49
  • 4
    Music notation always leaves stuff out, stuff that (in that period) the composer deliberately left up to the performer to decide. But sometimes, like this, it abbreviates in a way that annoys computer programmers and language lawyers but is completely reasonable to the everyday performer. Commented Jul 18, 2019 at 1:55
4

Triplet eighths are 2/3 the duration of a real eighth, so if you don't want to put every note in a triplet you can also give all notes a scaled duration. So your music would be

\relative c' { gis8*2/3 cis e gis, cis e % etc

Remember to remove any other explicit durations so that implicit durations prevail from the first note here.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.