6

Here you see a fragment from Francesco Geminiani's Guida Armonica (ca. 1752), a sort of 'dictionary' or catalogue of figured bass snippets. My question is, what do the isolated horizontal dashes mean in some of the figurings, such as in the third snippet of the first row? As far as I can tell, they are not the usual extender lines.

Any help would be much appreciated!

Guida Armonica - excerpt

Note: most of the snippets in the book seem to be in either D minor or D major; the bass clef is always implied.

5

Figured bass written when it was a living notation is often not so neatly formalized as modern figured bass used as a teaching aid for learning common practice harmony.

Also, most music editions published in this era have plenty of typos, so if something seems totally incomprehensible, it may just be nonsense!

The horizontal lines are continuation lines, but not positioned in a systematic way as in modern figured bass. You have to work out what note in the previous chord is intended to be tied, bearing in mind that the relevant note might not have been indicated by a figure at all.

In the first example, the two chords are G Bb D E and A D F, so the two D's should be tied together to make one long note. That restricts the possibilities for voicing the chords, since the two Ds can not be in different voices, or an octave apart.

In the second example the first chord, with no figures, implies 8 5 3. In the second chord, the 5 is tied over, the 8 falls to 7, and the 3 rises to 3#.

In the first example on the second line, the only common note is the octave of the bass D, which (like the bass note itself) would be tied.

In the final example the common note is the doubled A in the first chord, and the rest of the voice leading would be from C# to C natural, and E to F#.

If you want to study this text in detail, download the "supplement" from IMSLP (which I assume is where you found the main book.) The preface to the supplement contains some explanation about completing Geminiani's figuring - for example 6 4# (which is a dissonant chord) implies 6 4# 2, though of course 6 4 (which is consonant) is complete as written (or it means 8 6 4 if you want to be pedantic.)

  • Judging from the engraving, this was not "published in this era" but in the middle of the 18th century. Also, I do not understand the explanation of the line in either the 6/4 or the ♭6/4 example. – phoog Aug 5 at 8:59
  • Thank you for this excellent reply! I second phoog's non-understanding of the b6/4 example. – Kim Fierens Aug 5 at 12:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.