1

Common practice music employs only a small handful of time signatures, but there is a multitude of different dances. The steps are different. But is there something other than meter and tempo that makes a piece of music more suitable for one dance and less suitable for the other?

For example, sarabande and minuet are both slow dances in 3/4 time. Is the music interchangeable? If not, then what makes them musically different?

I would be particularly interested in examples from baroque music and European folk music.

|improve this question
  • 1
    Meter and rhythm are very different things. You dance to a rhythm, not to a meter. A waltz is more that "one, two, three, one, two, three", and a tango is more than "one, two, three, four, one, two, three, four". – Your Uncle Bob Aug 7 '19 at 5:55
  • In modern ballroom, both rumba and cha-cha (American form) are played about 120 bpm but are different.Similarly for tango and foxtrot (also about 120 to 128 bpm) and are clearly different. (To be fair, some dancers will do any of them to any of the music.) – ttw Oct 7 '19 at 18:49
3

At least for dances from the Romantic era and backwards, music for different dance types in the same meter and tempo are not quite interchangeable. For example, even though they are both fairly slow dances in triple meter, the polonaise uses an 8th-16th-16th rhythmic pattern more often, emphasizes the first beat more, and often sounds more stately, while the sarabande (or at least its Baroque incarnation) emphasizes the second beat. Thus, rhythmic patterns and emphasis in the melody can make a piece of music more suitable for one dance and less suitable for the other.

|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.