3

I'm currently learning Liebesleid (Love's Sorrow) - Kreisler (arr. Rachmaninoff) and I'm a bit confused about the last tie/slur of this part. Is it the E that's tied or is it the A that's slurred?

At first I thought it was 3 ties but I think the last one is a slur?

description

2 Answers 2

3

It's definitely a slur from the A to the G♮, and for at least a few reasons:

  1. The beginning of this slur/tie is above the initial E. Engravers make mistakes, but that's a hard mistake to rationalize.
  2. The first edition of the score makes it pretty clear that the A on beat 1 ultimately moves to the F♯ in the next measure, thereby connecting this A to G♮:

enter image description here

  1. And if it were a tie connecting two Es, the engraver likely would have just written a dotted half note.
1

That last E is definitely not tied to the one before it in that second bar shown. If it was, the 'tie' line would start below the first E. It's a slur line, referring to the A>G♯>G♮ chromatic run. Also, since both Es are shown with stems down, it would have made more sense to write a dotted minim at the beginning, had it supposedly been a note lasting the whole bar.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.