1

enter image description here

The key is in E Major.

The chord progression goes like E - C#m - B/F#,F# - B

I thought the chord progressions were I - Vi - V/V - I

But if you see the first bar at the picture, there is A# in the C#m chord.

This got me thinking this is a ii-V-I progression.

But then another question occurred.

Are ii V I chord progression's scale based on the upcoming I ? in this case the B chord.

If it is, doesn't this automatically cause key change ? Because by doing this, your appointing the I to be the tonic.

I never knew deep about the ii V I chord progression, but I thought I could just use it to any chords on the key to just pass by and add more harmonic flavor, but if this is the case, every time I use it to any chord that is not the tonic of the current key, it will cause key change...

Am I getting something wrong here ?

1

We really need to stop considering 'a key' as purely diatonic notes and chords. Straying into harmonies that are on each side of the 'keys'' place on the circle of 4/5s is so commonplace it doesn't raise much of an eyebrow. As in 'key E', there will be places where F♯ harmony or D harmony crops up in many pieces. When they do, it's often in an ephemeral way - just a fleeting visit to somewhere interesting, then back to basics - known generally as a modulation.

  • Can you elaborate how is this happaning ? – Hyun Yoo Park Feb 9 at 2:10
0

I think you want to look at more than chord names like E, C#m and label your Roman numerals with keys as well as pay attention to phrase endings.

It's important that the section you posted has a second ending volta. It looks like you are at the end of a musical period (two-part phrase group) that modulated to the dominant, and after the double bar the B chord becomes a dominant seventh using an A natural rather that the A# of the previous bar, and moves to an E chord. All of that looks like a very conventional handling of the dominant where the music modulated to the dominant and then modulates back to B being the dominant of E.

Analysis would be like this: |B: ii6/5 I6/4 V7 I ||: E: V7 | I | ...where B: and E: are indicating the keys.

So, when you suggest I - Vi - V/V - I could be re-interpreted as ii V I you are really identifying the modulation. I think your description of the harmony is right on track. You are recognizing a shift in tonic, a modulation. Just add the key labels to make it clear.

When you see a pattern that fits ii V I into a key, it often makes sense to label it as a modulation. Of course you need to look at the phrase context to know if it makes sense as a modulation. If it coincides with a phrase ending, a modulation analysis makes sense.

  • So I thought the C#m is a pivot chord E: Vi , B: ii. But because the A# note is presented here, it clearly looks like this is B: ii, rather then a pivot chord between E: and B:. So then, does that mean the chord progression is actually going like this ? E: I - B: ii - V - I. If it is, how can I just go from E: I to B: E ? – Hyun Yoo Park Feb 9 at 10:52
  • Some people don't bother with labeling pivot chords. Personally, I don't see the point. ii V I is such a common cadential pattern, I like to label it fully in one key. But, you could label it with two keys to show the pivot if you want. – Michael Curtis Feb 10 at 13:54
0

There is no need of key change here. This is a half cadence. You’ll find this quite often in the first ending of a repeated phrase. The progression I vi V/V can also be analyzed as I (ii V)/ V and we speak of an extension to to the dominant. The 1st bar after the double barline is still in the dominant and the piece continues in E major.

0

That "A# in a C#m chord" would perhaps be better considered an inverted viidim7/V. Then when the A# appears again, it is in a V/V. Both of these uses of secondary dominance in the 2nd ending make for a very dramatic half-cadence in the music. It may even trick the listener into thinking the key has changed. However, going on into the next measure, we are back at a B-dominant 7, no A#, followed by an E major chord, telling us that the B major chord of the 2nd ending was just a half cadence after all.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.