0

Can the Descending Fifths sequence also be correctly named as an Ascending Fourth's sequence ? in major : I - IV - vii dim - iii - vi - ii - V - I Is Johann Pachelbel (1653-1706) and his Canon in D the original source for this heavenly sequence ?

3
  • 1
    Beautiful. The circle progression.
    – user50691
    Mar 5, 2020 at 22:44
  • Your progression is : i - iv - i = g - c - g
    – Thomas
    Mar 6, 2020 at 5:22
  • I am so new here . I just realized ggcg is a name for a musician and not a musical progression. Just saying.
    – Thomas
    Mar 6, 2020 at 5:38

2 Answers 2

2

Descending fifths are equivalent to ascending fourths; these intervals are the inversion of each other. Note that in the sequence of roots: C-F-B-E-A-D-G, one can either go C up to F then down to B, up to E then down to A, etc.; or one can go C down to F then Up to B, etc. Either way leads to the same set of roots (but not necessarily notes in the same octave.)

The Pachelbel Canon sequence isn't a sequence of fourths. This sequence dates back at least a century before Pachelbel. His version goes C-G-a-e-F-C-F-G. There are quite a few other similar patterns going under the name "Romanesca." The sequence starts up a fifth, up a second, up a fifth (probably dropping the actual notes an octave) and the up a second, etc. This sequence actually has hits basis in the "rule of the octave" which was just a set of patterns of chords to be played over each note of an octave. The pattern (using a slash to indicate a base not if not the root of the chord symbol) goes like this: C-G/B-a-e/G-f-C/E-F-G. The bass line drops by step from C to E then back to G. In Roman Numerals it's: I-V6-vi-iii6-IV-I6-IV-V. Alternatives are I-V6-vi-I64-IV-I6-ii6-V and others. (The I64 is just another idiomatic use of a 6-4 chord.

Some chord sequences are based on roots; some are based on bass movement; some seem irregular.

0

It seems to me the common wordings are:

  • descending fifth
  • descending fourth
  • descending third
  • ascending second (or step)

...in other words descending intervals except for the ascending step.

Pachelbel is famous but all of these progressions and various harmonic sequences - like Falling Thirds used in his "canon" - are too old and universal to be ascribed to one person.

Also, @ttw makes a good point to distinguish root progressions (at the basic level a two chord movement, a musical bi-gram) and harmonic sequences which typically have a two chord progression reiterated and transposed. The Pachelbel example is a harmonic sequence.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.