If I have a tie note crossing two measures, say 2 whole G notes, and I have an accidental, say a sharp, on the first G, my assumption is that the accidental applies as well to the second G because it is tied. If I wanted it to not apply, what would be the convention? Would it be simply to not have a tie note in the first place and have two separate notes, a sharped G and a G itself?

If I have a tied note across a bar line, say 2 whole G notes, and I have an accidental, say a sharp, on the first G, my assumption is that the accidental applies as well to the second G because it is tied. If I wanted it to not apply, what would be the convention? Would it be simply to not have a tie note in the first place and have two separate notes, a sharped G and a G itself?

If I have a tie note crossing two measures, say 2 whole G notes, and I have an accidental, say a sharp, on the first G, my assumption is that the accidental applies as well to the second G because it is tied. If I wanted it to not apply, what would be the convention? Would it be simply to not have a tie note in the first place and have two separate notes, a sharped G and a G itself?

(I more than welcome any minor edits to the question title and body and any appropriate tagging as I'm new here and my music notation is rusty. I'm pretty certain this could be worded better.)

If I have a tie note crossing two measures, say 2 whole G notes, and I have an accidental, say a sharp, on the first G, my assumption is that the accidental applies as well to the second G because it is tied. If I wanted it to not apply, what would be the convention? Would it be simply to not have a tie note in the first place and have two separate notes, a sharped G and a G itself?