Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackMusic/status/914948370317348864
summarizing question for shorter tittle
Source Link
Martin
  • 211
  • 1
  • 8

Why do we count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitoneactual "semitone" taken as the unit and therefore called "tone""a tone"?

TheA more practical formulation of the question "Howis "Why do we started to count by tones, instead of semitones?" is more practical, but theits meaning could be misinterpreted; the target of what I meanthe question is actually better reflected withon the second question. Another formulation would beconcept of "1 tone" as a unit:
  Why wasn't the smaller "leap","Why wasn't the "semitone"smaller "interval leap", the actual semitone, taken as the unit and therefore called "tone" taken as the unit (and then called "aor "one tone")?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

Why do we count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitone called "tone"?

The question "How do we started to count by tones, instead of semitones?" is more practical but the meaning of what I mean is actually better reflected with the second question. Another formulation would be:
  Why wasn't the smaller "leap", the "semitone", taken as the unit (and then called "a tone")?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

Why wasn't the actual "semitone" taken as the unit and therefore called "a tone"?

A more practical formulation of the question is "Why do we count by tones, instead of semitones?", but its meaning could be misinterpreted; the target of the question is actually on the concept of "1 tone" as a unit: "Why wasn't the smaller "interval leap", the actual semitone, taken as the unit and therefore called "tone" (or "one tone")?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

small rewording for more clarity
Source Link
Martin
  • 211
  • 1
  • 8

How did Why do we started to count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitone called "tone"?

The first question in the tittle"How do we started to count by tones, instead of semitones?" is more practical but the meaning of what I mean is actually better reflected with the second question. Another formulation would be:
Why wasn't the smaller "leap",Why wasn't the smaller "leap", the semitone"semitone", taken as the unittaken as the unit (and then called "a tone")?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

How did we started to count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitone called "tone"?

The first question in the tittle is more practical but the meaning of what I mean is better reflected with the second. Another formulation would be:
Why wasn't the smaller "leap", the semitone, taken as the unit?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

Why do we count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitone called "tone"?

The question "How do we started to count by tones, instead of semitones?" is more practical but the meaning of what I mean is actually better reflected with the second question. Another formulation would be:
Why wasn't the smaller "leap", the "semitone", taken as the unit (and then called "a tone")?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?

Source Link
Martin
  • 211
  • 1
  • 8

How did we started to count by "tones", instead of by semitones? i.e. Why wasn't the semitone called "tone"?

The first question in the tittle is more practical but the meaning of what I mean is better reflected with the second. Another formulation would be:
Why wasn't the smaller "leap", the semitone, taken as the unit?

We say there're 6 tones in an octave and then that the distance of the notes of major scale (for example) jump 1-1-1/2-1-1-1-1/2 tones.

Why wasn't what is known as "half tone" called a tone since the beginning, as a tone is not any unit whatsoever? Using the actual semitone as a unit, i.e. as a tone, we would have and octave with 12 tones and then simply show that the the "leaps" go 2-2-1-2-2-2-1 tones.

Is there a practical rationale for things not being this way and being the way they are? Are they this way merely for arbitrary or historical reasons?