If I follow your question's concern, I think you are expecting the chords symbols to be...
C/G
then G6
or
Gsus4
then G6
...because of the C
in middle staff, first beat.
But the chord symbols are there to show what a guitarist should play rather than some kind non chord tone label or analysis.
The chord in this section is G6
and their is a non-chord tone C
resolving to a B
.
Another way to think about this situation is a very old idea from figured bass harmony. A chord in second in version like C/G
is a harmonic idea, basically dealing with chord roots. But figured bass looked at it as a double appoggiatura over a G
bass, it look at it as a contrapuntal thing, it would be called a "chord of the sixth", but the G
bass was the fundamental thing rather than a theoretical root of C
.
From the figured bass, contrapuntal perspective the C
is an embellishment to resolve, not really a proper chord tone.
If you go with the modern, harmonic, chord root perspective you should be identifying 6/4
chords in the four categories: cadential, passing, pedal, or arpeggiated. The example doesn't include before/after one chord so we can't really explore it this way.
This seem like a lot of theory to throw around. I think the simple idea is don't casually identify 6/4
chords. First suspect them as non-chord tone, contrapuntal elements, unless you can fit them clearly into one of the four harmonic categories.