4

I have this section below and I want to indicate that unison notes need to be played by the entire section, while the cords should be divisi. Is there a cleaner way to indicate this?

enter image description here

The effect would be something like below if it was written in two staves:

enter image description here

0

2 Answers 2

12

To prevent the possible interpretation of double stops for the high notes (without writing “div.” on every second note), write the two parts as separate voices; give the upper voice stems pointing up, and the lower voice stems pointing down, and place articulations outside the staff:

The upper voice stems up, and the lower voice stems down. Notes played by both voices share noteheads.

If it gets too complicated or hard to read, then the staff can be temporarily split into two separate staves.


For some examples, see the Introduction of Stravinsky’s The Firebird (ballet), K010:

  • In measures 8–10, two of the double basses are playing a divided soli (there are only two players, so marking “div.” explicitly is unnecessary in this case):

    Excerpt of The Firebird, showing a divided double bass soli, with the stems in opposite directions.

  • In measures 17–20, the cello section is playing divided:

    Excerpt of The Firebird, showing divided cellos, with the stems in opposite directions.


Also note, whereas “div.” is an abbreviation of “divisi”, “arco” isn’t an abbreviation, so it shouldn’t have a “.”.

1
  • Nice tip! Thanks a lot! Commented Jul 16 at 2:27
1

There are some answers already, I’ll add this possibility:

enter image description here

But in this case it is probably clear if you mark the whole passage as divisi that the single notes are unisono.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.