I'm reading the book The Complete Idiot's Guide to Music Theory, and in the book is a cool table with chord leading patterns.
The explanation in the book is this: So if you have a scale with the chords I
ii
iii
IV
V
vi
vii
°, it tells you a way to arrange the chords, in this fashion:
I
(tonic) -> go to any chord
. If i choose IV
, then I can go to I
, iii
, V
, vii
°, so I choose V
, and go back to the tonic. So you get the popular chord progression I IV V
.
The whole table is this:
- I -> any
- ii -> IV, V, vii°
- iii -> ii, IV, vi
- IV -> I, iii, V, vii°
- V -> I
- vi -> ii, IV, V, I
- vii° -> I, iii
I like to think of this as a tip, that is similar to playing notes in the scale (you can choose any chord in any order, but if you respect this pattern, it will sound good, like how you can play notes outside the scale, but if you play only notes in the scale, it will sound good).
Does the same pattern apply for other scales, that aren't the same structure (major, minor, minor, etc.)?
For example, B lydian, which is I
II
iii
iv
° V
vi
vii
(major, major, minor, etc.):
- I -> any
- II -> iv°, V, vii
- iii -> II, iv°, vi
- iv° -> I, iii, V, vii
- V -> I
- vi -> II, iv°, V, I
- vii -> I, iii
Is this way of chord leading based on the order and type of chord (tonic, supertonic, etc.) like I did in the list above, or is there something more to it?