11

I'm trying to write sheet music for a piece with a pickup measure of 5 sixteenth notes. Lilypond has the \partial command for this, but it only accepts a single duration. That duration may be dotted, but that doesn't help since I need 5 notes, not 3, 6 or 7.

I've tried various combinations of partials, e.g. using the command twice:

\version "2.16.0"

\relative c'' {
    \key g \major
    \partial 4 \partial 16 g16 g fis d b | e2
}

which produces a barcheck warning

warning: barcheck failed at: 1/4
   \partial 4 \partial 16 g16 g fis d b 
                                        | e2

and a wrong result:

enter image description here

I've tried other things like \partial { 4 16 } or \partial 4~16 but nothing seems to work; either the pickup measure is ignored or it has a wrong length.

Is there any solution for this? I don't want to use a pickup measure of one half note with 3 sixteenth rests.

3 Answers 3

20

\partial 16*5. Some people prefer writing \partial 1*5/16 which scales \partial 1 by the fraction 5/16, but I'd lean towards the simpler version.

enter image description here

2
  • 1
    Clever! I've seen that * for multi-measure rests, but never for notes or things like this. I even't can't find a definition for this notation in the documentation. Or is it a general Scheme trick?
    – Glorfindel
    Oct 22, 2020 at 6:14
  • 1
    @Glorfindel It's documented here. \partial isn't mentioned, but it works anywhere a note-like duration is expected. It has nothing to do with Scheme, although you can use a Scheme expression as the scaling factor as mentioned in the documentation.
    – benrg
    Sep 28, 2023 at 19:58
2

I've found one workaround, but I'm not sure I really like it since the sum of the \partial durations is longer than the actual pickup measure:

\version "2.16.0"

\relative c'' {
    \key g \major
    \partial 4 g16 \partial 4 g fis d b | e2
}

and Lilypond warns about this:

trying to use \partial after the start of a piece
   \partial 4 g16 
                  \partial 4 g fis d b | e2

but the result is correct:

enter image description here

Using \partial 4 g16 g fis d \partial 16 b | e2 instead doesn't work properly, since it inserts a bar line after the d already (and produces a warning in the compiler):

enter image description here

I'm really interested in a better solution (if it exists)!

-3

Try: \partial 16 * 5 g16 g16 fes16 d16 b16 | e2

2
  • 1
    Is this any different to user72605's answer? Sep 28, 2023 at 17:10
  • @ElementsinSpace yes - it replaces the fis in my question with a different, wrong note. For someone who has severe problems reading staffs with more than two flats, that even borders on an insult ...
    – Glorfindel
    Sep 28, 2023 at 17:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.